I shall try to clarify this discussion.

There are actually two different things being discussed. The first is, I hope, not too controversial. The second is so controversial as to be a hopeless cause.

First, the primary use case for "keeping OFW alive" is for debugging purposes. OFW remains resident in memory so that, if the OS is set to allow it (not the default), a hot-key freezes the OS and enters OFW, where a human can inspect the state of devices and OS data structures. A high skill level is required, so it's okay if some fiddling is necessary to find or establish virtual addresses or do similar magic . In my career of working closely with hardware manufacturers, I and others have found this feature to be extremely helpful. Often it has resulted in the resolution of difficult problems that were blocking the ability to ship the product - problems that resisted other kernel debugging techniques.

The second topic is the hypothetical use of OFW as a HAL. That will not happen for several reasons. The opposition to the idea is widespread and deeply held, and there are good arguments to support that opposition. Furthermore, the economic conditions necessary for the creation of such a HAL do not exist in the ARM world, nor indeed in the Linux world in general. (The necessary condition is the ability for one company to impose a substantial change by fiat - essentially a monopoly position.)

Shall we agree, then, that any further discussion of the HAL issue is "just for fun", and that nobody needs to feel threatened that it would actually happen?

The potential for "vendors breaking out of the debugging use case and turning it into a HAL" is miniscule, because

a) The callback is disabled by default
b) The technical challenges of the callback interface limit its applicability to specific "wizard user" scenarios c) OFW is unlikely to achieve sufficient market penetration for the HAL thing to be worth doing

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to