On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:57:55AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: >> Last missing piece is being able to do "select FOO = n", which Stephen >> is currently working on. > > I thought Linus' idea was to use: > > KBUILD_KCONFIG=file make allnoconfig
That was more a prototype of the idea; but it's a pretty cumbersome user interface. :-) By changing the makefile to look for kconfig fragments in the configs directory, the user interface for choosing a config remains exactly the same. As for the allnoconfig bit.... > in which case any option which would be presented to the user which hasn't > been selected by 'file' ends up being set to n. That means there's no > need for a special "select FOO=n" construct. ...Linus chimed in on this that he doesn't actually care much. I think defconfig with an empty initial config file makes a lot more sense than allnoconfig so that we're using the default values from the normal Kconfig files. > See one of Linus' replies on June 3: > Message-ID: <alpine.lfd.2.00.1006031317410.8...@i5.linux-foundation.org> See this response: Message-ID: <aanlktik-qcxfnjma3j28b9h27uajocdhthtgz99zk...@mail.gmail.com> http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3cAANLkTik%2dQCXFnjma3J28B9h27uajOcDhthTGz99zKgVi%40mail.gmail.com%3e g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
