On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Kumar Gala <ga...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>
>> + soc8...@e0000000 {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> + device_type = "soc";
>> + compatible = "simple-bus";
>> + ranges = <0x0 0xe0000000 0x100000>;
>> + bus-frequency = <0>;
>> +
>> + ecm-...@0 {
>> + compatible = "fsl,ecm-law";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x1000>;
>> + fsl,num-laws = <8>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + e...@1000 {
>> + compatible = "fsl,mpc8555-ecm", "fsl,ecm";
>> + reg = <0x1000 0x1000>;
>> + interrupts = <17 2>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + memory-control...@2000 {
>> + compatible = "fsl,8555-memory-controller";
>
> fsl,mpc8555?
Ah, yes -- it seems the dts I used for an example also has this
problem. In drivers/edac/mpc85xx_edac.c, bindings still work for
fsl,85.. style notation, but a comment claims that this notation would
be deprecated at some point (2.6.29 or 2.6.30). I have updated my
local copy and it works fine, should I send a new patch? I could also
extend this change to the other DTS files affected (A quick search
found 14 instances of fsl,85.. style notation.) Please let me know
what I should do.
>
>> + reg = <0x2000 0x1000>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
>> + interrupts = <18 2>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + L2: l2-cache-control...@20000 {
>
> fsl,mpc8555?
>
>> + compatible = "fsl,8555-l2-cache-controller";
>> + reg = <0x20000 0x1000>;
>> + cache-line-size = <32>; // 32 bytes
>> + cache-size = <0x40000>; // L2, 256K
>> + interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
>> + interrupts = <16 2>;
>> + };
>> +
>
> - k
>
>
>
>
Best Regards,
Bradley
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
