On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:10:06 -0600 Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:05:03AM +0200, christophe leroy wrote: > > This patch applies to 2.6.34.7 and 2.6.35.4 > > It fixes an issue during the probe for CPM1 with definition of parameter > > ram from DTS > > > > Signed-off-by: christophe leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr> > > I'm sorry, I don't understand the fix from the given description. > What is the problem, and why is cpm_muram_alloc_fixed() the wrong > thing to call on CPM1? Does CPM2 still need it? I don't see how cpm_muram_alloc_fixed() can be used safely at all. If you need a fixed address, it shouldn't be part of the general allocation pool, or something else might get it first. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
