> -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Friday, October 15, 2010 0:03 AM > To: Zang Roy-R61911 > Cc: Anton Vorontsov; linux-...@lists.infradead.org; dw...@infradead.org; > dedeki...@gmail.com; a...@linux-foundation.org; Lan Chunhe-B25806; Wood Scott- > B07421; Gala Kumar-B11780; linuxppc-...@ozlabs.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v4] P4080/eLBC: Make Freescale elbc interrupt common > to elbc devices > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 23:43:38 -0700 > "Zang Roy-R61911" <r61...@freescale.com> wrote: > > > > Plus, I think the patch is not runtime bisectable (i.e. you > > > now do request_irq() here, but not removing it from the nand > > > driver, so nand will fail to probe). > > Nand driver does not need to request irq. It will use the irq requested by > lbc. > > remember, other lbc device may also need to use this registered irq. > > It should not be removed in nand driver. > > The point is that you need to make both changes in the same patch.
But according to previous discussion, if lbc driver is registered successful, it will not be removed. (.remove function is dropped in the patch). that is not bisectable? nand driver will not touch the irq. all irq status process is in the lbc driver. Thanks. Roy _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
