Micha Nelissen <mi...@neli.hopto.org> wrote: > > In various parts of the enumeration and routing algorithm, it would need > to lookup the tag to find the destid, if the destid is in the tag then > this lookup is not needed.
Let's keep this discussion within limits of the current implementation. Existing method of forming CT may be replaced when that change is justified by use. Any method that may be implemented later is good if it ensures unique identification of RIO devices. At this moment, we just need to define CT format now to avoid future conflicts of enumeration methods. > Well, we both know "the current mainline implementation" is easily > improved to unique identification I proposed. Therefore this statement > is misleading. Your improvement will require assigning separate destID to any switch that has no endpoints attached. I prefer to keep changes to enumeration for later patches. Alex. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
