On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 15:01 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> I always read it as "for each child-OF-node", so I would rename it to
> "dt_for_each_child_node".

Well, it was meant to be for_child_of_node not _OF_node :-)

Cheers,
Ben.


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to