On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Timur Tabi <ti...@freescale.com> wrote: > Grant Likely wrote: >> No. It is a static property of the board/machine. It is expected it >> to be encoded into the board's .dts file. > > Ok, but that only makes sense if the monitor is hard-wired to the board > itself. > If a user can attach any monitor he wants, then the EDID data can't be known > at > compile time. > > I guess it's no different than using hard-coded memory controller programming > instead of SPD. You can safely avoid SPD only if the DDR chips are soldered > on > the board.
Correct, if a real EDID i2c channel exists, then an edid property should *not* be specified in the device tree. g. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
