On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 11:07 +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > So additionally, I'd suggest: > > 1. Instrument checkpatch.pl and make it err or warn on timestamps. > > This is patch 34/34 in this series: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/5/198
Yeah, great, did not notice, thanks! > > 2. Probably instrument linux-next to rise a warning when people break > > this. > > I'm not sure if Stephen has that much spare time, and I don't think it > is necessary. I think the checkpatch check is sufficient and I'll check > myself occasionally. Yes, that's fine, I just wanted to speak this out - there is a probability that someone gets excited and creates some instrumentation to kbuild to automatically detect bad things and then Stephen could easily use that. WRT "not necessary" - well, I think it is always better to cut bad things before they are merged, rather than afterwards. But anyway, let's forget about this. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий) _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev