On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:40:54PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:22:56PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > This patch is to consolidate SDHCI driver for Freescale eSDHC
> > controller found on both MPCxxx and i.MX platforms.  It merges
> > sdhci-of-esdhc.c into sdhci-esdhc.c, so that the same pair of
> > .probe/.remove hook works with eSDHC for two platforms.
> > 
> > As the results, sdhci-of-esdhc.c and sdhci-esdhc.h are removed, and
> > header esdhc.h containing the definition of esdhc_platform_data is
> > put into the public folder.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn....@linaro.org>
> 
> I agree with Anton about not merging the two...
> 
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ESDHC_IMX
> > +#define cpu_is_mx25()      (0)
> > +#define cpu_is_mx35()      (0)
> > +#define cpu_is_mx51()      (0)
> > +#define cpu_is_imx()       (0)
> > +#else
> > +#define cpu_is_imx()       (1)
> > +#endif
> 
> ... e.g. that looks a bit frightening.
> 
Agree.

The use of cpu_is_mx..() in the driver itself seems a churn to me
even without this consolidation patch.  Is it possible for us to
eliminate them by using pdata, and eventually device tree?  When we
are there, I might want to revisit the consolidation again.

-- 
Regards,
Shawn

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to