On Nov 9, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:

> As part of splitting CONFIG_E500 into separate options for e500v1/v2 and
> e500mc/e5500, some code only needs to be built when e5500 support is
> required.
> 
> This adds a new internal-use config option for both 32-bit and 64-bit
> builds that enables only the e5500 support code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Moffett <kyle.d.moff...@boeing.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig    |    2 +-
> arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype |    4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig 
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
> index 248f87c..72488d4 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
> @@ -231,8 +231,8 @@ endif # PPC32
> config P5020_DS
>       bool "Freescale P5020 DS"
>       depends on FSL_E500MC || PPC_BOOK3E_64
> +     select FSL_E5500
>       select DEFAULT_UIMAGE
> -     select E500
>       select PHYS_64BIT_DT_REQUIRED
>       select SWIOTLB
>       select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype 
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
> index fd37bb2..cff45e3 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype
> @@ -144,6 +144,10 @@ config 8xx
> config PPC_85xx
>       bool
> 
> +config FSL_E5500
> +     bool
> +     select E500
> +
> config E500
>       select FSL_EMB_PERFMON
>       select PPC_FSL_BOOK3E
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5

Nak, I don't want to add a unique build option for 64-bit E5500 vs E500MC.  We 
have E6500 coming and I don't want to introduce CONFIG_FSL_E6500 at that point.

- k

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to