On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:28 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 19:36 -0500, Will Drewry wrote: > > Facilitate the use of CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER by wrapping compatibility > > system call numbering for execve and selecting HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER. > > > > v9: rebase on to bccaeafd7c117acee36e90d37c7e05c19be9e7bf > > > > Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <w...@chromium.org> > > Seen these around for a while ... :-) > > I don't see a harm in the patches per-se tho I haven't reviewed the > actual seccomp filter stuff and it's good (or bad) behaviour on ppc.
Did that stuff every got anywhere ? I don't see HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER upsteam ... should I just drop the powerpc patch from patchwork ? Cheers, Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
