On Nov 29, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:

> Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Ben would probably have to answer that.  I can't remember why he wanted it.  
>> I'm sure he has a good reason.
> 
> Well, I'm not sure what's going on with the code.  I *think* what's happening 
> is that the first call of_platform_bus_probe() is scanning most, but not all, 
> of the tree, and it's somehow reserving all of those nodes.  Then we call 
> of_platform_bus_probe() again, but it never finds the DMA nodes.  
> of_platform_bus_probe() never actually calls of_platform_bus_create() this 
> time around.  Perhaps the recursive nature of of_platform_bus_create() is 
> part of the problem.
> 
> The only fix I can think of is to move "fsl,eloplus-dma" into 
> mpc85xx_common_ids[].  I'll post a patch that does that, and we can discuss 
> it.

what if you make the p1022_ds_ids call first?  Maybe we need to add 'soc' to 
p1022_ds_ids list

- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to