On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 19:47 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > As Scott said, I was more asking about the 2nd patch in the sequence > which did touch MTD. Since that one is dependent on this patch, > wondering how we wanted to handle them.
I do not have time to review it, but it looks OK, so I'd suggest to merge it vie the same tree as the rest of the patches. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
