On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:00:12PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > [email protected] wrote: > > Sure, something like that is fine, but if the code really can't be a > > module, why not just fix the Kconfig file to enforce this properly > > instead? > > That's the simplest approach, for use. The TTY portion of the driver can > be used as a module. Is there any real value in loading a TTY driver as a > module?
Depends on the hardware it supports :) > In this case, the console support for byte channels would not be > available. Then it doesn't make sense, right? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
