On 02/24/2012 08:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > When during guest context we get a performance monitor interrupt, we > currently bail out and oops. Let's route it to its correct handler > instead. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> > --- > arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c > index 7adef28..423701b 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c > @@ -677,6 +677,10 @@ int kvmppc_handle_exit(struct kvm_run *run, struct > kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > r = RESUME_GUEST; > break; > > + case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_PERFORMANCE_MONITOR: > + r = RESUME_GUEST; > + break; > + > case BOOKE_INTERRUPT_HV_PRIV: > r = emulation_exit(run, vcpu); > break;
Why do we need to call timer_interrupt() explicitly, but can rely on automatic retriggering for perfmon? -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
