> > With the original EEH implementation, the EEH global statistics
> > are maintained by individual global variables. That makes the
> > code a little hard to maintain.
>
> Hi Gavin,
>
> > @@ -1174,21 +1182,24 @@ static int proc_eeh_show(struct seq_file *m, void
> > *v)
> > {
> > if (0 == eeh_subsystem_enabled) {
> > seq_printf(m, "EEH Subsystem is globally disabled\n");
> > - seq_printf(m, "eeh_total_mmio_ffs=%ld\n", total_mmio_ffs);
> > + seq_printf(m, "eeh_total_mmio_ffs=%d\n",
> > eeh_stats.total_mmio_ffs);
> > } else {
> > seq_printf(m, "EEH Subsystem is enabled\n");
> > seq_printf(m,
> > - "no device=%ld\n"
> > - "no device node=%ld\n"
> > - "no config address=%ld\n"
> > - "check not wanted=%ld\n"
> > - "eeh_total_mmio_ffs=%ld\n"
> > - "eeh_false_positives=%ld\n"
> > - "eeh_slot_resets=%ld\n",
> > - no_device, no_dn, no_cfg_addr,
> > - ignored_check, total_mmio_ffs,
> > - false_positives,
> > - slot_resets);
> > + "no device =%d\n"
> > + "no device node =%d\n"
> > + "no config address =%d\n"
> > + "check not wanted =%d\n"
> > + "eeh_total_mmio_ffs =%d\n"
> > + "eeh_false_positives =%d\n"
> > + "eeh_slot_resets =%d\n",
>
> There *might* be tools out there that parse this output, so I'd say
> don't change it unless you have to - and I don't think you have to?
>
Thanks for catching the point, Michael. I will change it back soon ;-)
Thanks,
Gavin
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
