On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 03:02:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > Please merge this via the ppc tree? > > > And let's ask the hexagon maintainers to take a look at the definition > in arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h. I assume that it can be removed, > but that might cause problems with files which include asm/atomic.h > directly. I have found two such files in non-arch code and have queued > fixes. There are no such files in arch/hexagon code, so I think it's > safe to zap the hexagon definition of atomic_inc_not_zero().
Just tested it; it's safe to zap the Hexagon definition of atomic_inc_not_zero()... I'm fine with this going in through some other tree (still getting mine set up). Thanks, Richard Kuo -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
