On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 07:30:58PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 09:32 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > However, there is an effort to get rid of stop_machine() from the
> > CPU-down path... So something else will be needed.
>
> Elsewhere in this thread I mentioned we could do a synchronize_sched().
> I think that covers most of what stop-machine is doing these days.
Ah, apologies for the noise!
Thanx, Paul
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
