On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 04:31:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> My overall take on the fault-injection code is that there has been a
> disappointing amount of uptake: I don't see many developers using them
> for whitebox testing their stuff. I guess this patchset addresses
> that, in a way.
I added support for make-it-fail to my syscall fuzzer a while ago.
(if the file exists, the child processes set it before calling the fuzzed
syscall).
I've not had a chance to really play with it, because I find enough problems
already even without it.
Dave
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
