On Jun 28, 2012, at 9:36 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Wood Scott-B07421 >> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 12:31 AM >> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951 >> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; ga...@kernel.crashing.org; Li Yang-R58472; >> ag...@suse.de; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/fsl: PCI refactoring and QEMU paravirt >> platform >> >> On 06/27/2012 11:06 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote: >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Wood Scott-B07421 >>>> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:49 AM >>>> To: ga...@kernel.crashing.org >>>> Cc: ag...@suse.de; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Jia Hongtao-B38951 >>>> Subject: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/fsl: PCI refactoring and QEMU paravirt >>>> platform >>>> >>>> The QEMU stuff is related to the PCI refactoring because currently >>>> we have a hard time selecting a primary bus under QEMU, and also >> because >>>> the generic qemu e500 platform wants a full list of FSL PCI >> compatibles >>>> to check. >>>> >>> >>> It seems that not all primary bus has "isa" node like 8541 and 8555. >> >> Do those boards (it's the boards that matter, not chips...) have legacy >> ISA? If they do, and it's not in the device tree, then we should fix >> the device tree for consistency, but also retain some sort of hack to >> remain compatible with old device trees. >> >> A board can refrain from using the new common infrastructure if it has a >> good reason to. > > I'm not sure that MPC8541CDS (or 8555) has legacy ISA. I just checked in > kernel and dts which implies the board has primary bus and no "isa" node. > I will find out the facts later.
Pretty sure the boards have ISA, if you see the .dts has references to 'ISA bridge' & 'i8259' PIC. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
