Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> writes:

> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 06:43:40PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> 
>> With larger vsid we need to track more bits of ESID in slb cache
>> for slb invalidate.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Minor comment below, but apart from that...
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
>
>> -    sldi    r11,r3,1                /* r11 = offset * sizeof(u16) */
>> -    rldicl  r10,r10,36,28           /* get low 16 bits of the ESID */
>> -    add     r11,r11,r13             /* r11 = (u16 *)paca + offset */
>> -    sth     r10,PACASLBCACHE(r11)   /* paca->slb_cache[offset] = esid */
>> +    sldi    r11,r3,2                /* r11 = offset * sizeof(u32) */
>> +    rldicl  r10,r10,36,28           /* get the 36 bits of the ESID */
>
> You're correct that the rldicl instruction produces 36 bits of result,
> and in fact it is equivalent to srdi r10,r10,28.  If you're changing
> the line you might as well change the instruction to the simpler form
> too.

done.

-aneesh

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to