Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> writes: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 06:43:40PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> >> With larger vsid we need to track more bits of ESID in slb cache >> for slb invalidate. >> >> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Minor comment below, but apart from that... > > Reviewed-by: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> > >> - sldi r11,r3,1 /* r11 = offset * sizeof(u16) */ >> - rldicl r10,r10,36,28 /* get low 16 bits of the ESID */ >> - add r11,r11,r13 /* r11 = (u16 *)paca + offset */ >> - sth r10,PACASLBCACHE(r11) /* paca->slb_cache[offset] = esid */ >> + sldi r11,r3,2 /* r11 = offset * sizeof(u32) */ >> + rldicl r10,r10,36,28 /* get the 36 bits of the ESID */ > > You're correct that the rldicl instruction produces 36 bits of result, > and in fact it is equivalent to srdi r10,r10,28. If you're changing > the line you might as well change the instruction to the simpler form > too.
done. -aneesh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev