On 7/19/2012 3:07 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:

On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote:

The sram_offset parameter represents a physical address
and should be of type phys_addr_t. As part of this fix,
the extraction of sram_params is being cleaned-up and
fixed.
This patch fixes now the case when the offset value of
0xfff00000 was being rejected by the driver (returning
-EINVAL), although this is a valid offset value.

Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <yuantian.t...@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.man...@freescale.com>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h |    4 +-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c     |   39 ++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h 
b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
index 60c9c0b..a4ce9b8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
- * Copyright 2009-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
+ * Copyright 2009-2010 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc

we normally do 2009-2010, 2012

Hi Kumar,

Should I re-spin this patch, with the copyright year formatted per your suggestion above?

Thanks,
claudiu


_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to