On Aug 7, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Scott Wood wrote: > On 08/07/2012 05:11 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote: >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org] >>> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:37 PM >>> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951 >>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472 >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/fsl-pci: Add pci inbound/outbound PM >>> support >>> >>> >>> On Jul 30, 2012, at 1:09 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote: >>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org] >>>>> Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 9:24 PM >>>>> To: Jia Hongtao-B38951 >>>>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421; Li Yang-R58472 >>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/fsl-pci: Add pci inbound/outbound PM >>>>> support >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 24, 2012, at 5:20 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Power supply for PCI inbound/outbound window registers is off when >>>>> system >>>>>> go to deep-sleep state. We save the values of registers before >>>>>> suspend and restore to registers after resume. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Yutang <b14...@freescale.com> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <b38...@freescale.com> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <le...@freescale.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 2 +- >>>>>> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_pci.c | 121 >>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>>>> 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> Remind me why we need to save/restore PCI ATMUs, why not just >>>>> re-parse the device tree to restore? >>>>> >>>>> - k >>>> >>>> Save/restore is the more efficient way. Latency of sleep/wakeup is one >>>> of most important features in power management. >>>> >>>> -Hongtao. >>> >>> I don't think the time it takes to run through setup_pci_atmu() is that >>> long compared to fsl_pci_resume(). >>> >>> Also, don't you need to setup PCICCSRBAR and do setup_pci_cmd() on resume? >>> >>> - k >> >> Hi Kumar, >> I did some tests on P1022DS and found out that PCI_CMD and PCICSRBAR is not >> lost when system in deep sleep. We don't need to save it. > > How does the PCI code know you're entering deep sleep and not hibernation? > > -Scott >
Also, are you sure PCICSRBAR does not need restoring? I'd be surprised if PCICSRBAR was ok, but the ATMUs where not. - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev