On 13.09.2012 [11:00:11 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On 13.09.2012 [22:37:39 +1000], Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:07 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Anticipating growth in coming years, we should ensure we are getting > > > a good lead on testing. > > > > Most changes to pseries_defconfig are copied into ppc64_defconfig. > > Should this one be as well? > > Ah, I didn't realize that was the case, sorry. Yes, it probably does > make sense to do this change. Should I just send a follow-on patch?
Actually, ppc64_defconfig doesn't currently define CONFIG_NR_CPUS. NR_CPUS' powerpc Kconfig allows 2-8192 already, so given the current state, I'm not sure any further patch is necessary? Thanks, Nish _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
