On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 05:31:58PM +0800, Li Zhong wrote: > I'm not sure whether it makes sense to add this dependency to avoid > CONFI_NUMA && !CONFIG_SMP. > > I want to do this because I saw some build errors on next-tree when > compiling with CONFIG_SMP disabled, and it seems they are caused by some > codes under the CONFIG_NUMA #ifdefs.
This seems to make sense to me. Can you please repost with a better changelog and a description of the actual build error you were seeing. cheers _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
