> -----Original Message----- > From: tiejun.chen [mailto:tiejun.c...@windriver.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 2:40 PM > To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; ag...@suse.de; kvm- > p...@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [v1][KVM][PATCH 1/1] kvm:ppc:booehv: direct ISI exception to > Guest > > On 05/09/2013 07:34 PM, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote: > >>>> VF stands for virtualization fault see MAS8[VF] and we may use it > for > >> virtualized > >> > >> Looks KVM PPC have no this mechanism currently since I don't find > MAS8_VF > >> is > >> used in kernel, right? > > > > Yes but 'we may use it' in the feature, I have a functional POC with > VF. > > Any IO performance to be improved with this POC?
VF approach puts more stress on HW TLB so I did not advance with performance measurements though it may worth to do it. -Mike _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
