On 05/27/2013 11:50 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 14:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 27 May 2013 21:50:04 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
However, that wouldn't help much with the allocation/leak problem,
though at least it would be easier to use. It could also *try* to re-use
the current allocation if the new content is of smaller or equal size.
I thought that dtc tried to aggressively save space by folding identical
strings. If you tried to reuse a property that had its contents shared
with another one, you would get interesting results I guess.
It used to be only property names, unless that has changed in recent
dtc. But that's a good point, we probably want a flag in struct property
like we have for nodes, indicating whether it comes from the original
fdt data pool or not.
But isn't that what current sparc implementation of of_set_property does
when it marks the property as dynamic?
Anyway, this definitely exceeds my knowledge of OF API for sure, so what
do I do about the MAC workaround now?
Prepare the patch with global arrays and switch to some of_set_property
as soon as it is available?
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
