> -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 12:39 AM > To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 > Cc: kvm-...@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- > d...@lists.ozlabs.org; Alexander Graf > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: PPC: Book3E: AltiVec support > > On 06/03/2013 03:54:22 PM, Mihai Caraman wrote: > > Mihai Caraman (6): > > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Fix AltiVec interrupt numbers and build breakage > > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Refactor SPE_FP exit handling > > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Rename IRQPRIO names to accommodate ALTIVEC > > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Add AltiVec support > > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Add ONE_REG AltiVec support > > KVM: PPC: Book3E: Enhance FPU laziness > > > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 16 ++- > > arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 189 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.h | 4 +- > > arch/powerpc/kvm/bookehv_interrupts.S | 8 +- > > arch/powerpc/kvm/e500.c | 10 +- > > arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_emulate.c | 8 +- > > arch/powerpc/kvm/e500mc.c | 10 ++- > > 7 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > This looks like a bit much for 3.10 (certainly, subject lines like > "refactor" and "enhance" and "add support" aren't going to make Linus > happy given that we're past rc4) so I think we should apply > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/242896/ for 3.10. Then for 3.11, > revert it after applying this patchset. >
Why not 1/6 plus e6500 removal? -Mike _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
