Anshuman Khandual <khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> When the task moves around the system, the corresponding cpuhw
> per cpu strcuture should be popullated with the BHRB filter
> request value so that PMU could be configured appropriately with
> that during the next call into power_pmu_enable().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khand...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

benh you might want to fix the spelling mistakes above 

  strcuture -> structure
  popullated -> populated

Otherwise:

Acked-by: Michael Neuling <mi...@neuling.org>


> ---
>  arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> index 426180b..48c68a8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c
> @@ -1122,8 +1122,11 @@ nocheck:
>  
>       ret = 0;
>   out:
> -     if (has_branch_stack(event))
> +     if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
>               power_pmu_bhrb_enable(event);
> +             cpuhw->bhrb_filter = ppmu->bhrb_filter_map(
> +                                     event->attr.branch_sample_type);
> +     }
>  
>       perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
>       local_irq_restore(flags);
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to