Anton Blanchard <an...@samba.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > The CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION disabling should be done in the Kconfig not > > here. > > > > I'm not that keen on another defconfig. benh is already talking about > > having a powernv defconfig. I'm worried we are going to fragment the > > defconfigs. If you want something special like LE, then change the > > default one. > > I agree we don't want machine specific defconfigs, but I think it makes > sense to have ones that cover the key options that conflict. I'm > thinking 32bit, 64bit, 64bit BookE, 64bit LE etc. > > One bonus is if we have a smaller set of defconfigs we might actually > get better testing. I have no idea which 32bit defconfigs I should test > for example, and I'm not going to test them all!
FWIW, I test with these configs and it seems to catch most of 32/64 bit, SMP/UP, differnt MMU issues: pseries_defconfig ppc64_defconfig ppc64e_defconfig pmac32_defconfig ppc44x_defconfig ppc6xx_defconfig mpc85xx_smp_defconfig mpc85xx_defconfig chroma_defconfig ps3_defconfig celleb_defconfig Mikey _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
