The rc variable is initially used to store the return code from the
ibm,update-properties rtas call which returns 0 or 1 on success. A return
code of 1 indicates that ibm,update-properties must be called again for the
node. However, the rc variable is overwritten by a call to update_dt_prop
which returns 0 on success. This results in ibm,update-properties not being
called again for the given node when the rtas call rc was previously 1.

Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c 
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
index f28abee..aaae85d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/mobility.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int update_dt_node(u32 phandle, s32 scope)
        struct update_props_workarea *upwa;
        struct device_node *dn;
        struct property *prop = NULL;
-       int i, rc;
+       int i, rc, rtas_rc;
        char *prop_data;
        char *rtas_buf;
        int update_properties_token;
@@ -154,9 +154,9 @@ static int update_dt_node(u32 phandle, s32 scope)
        upwa->phandle = phandle;
 
        do {
-               rc = mobility_rtas_call(update_properties_token, rtas_buf,
+               rtas_rc = mobility_rtas_call(update_properties_token, rtas_buf,
                                        scope);
-               if (rc < 0)
+               if (rtas_rc < 0)
                        break;
 
                prop_data = rtas_buf + sizeof(*upwa);
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static int update_dt_node(u32 phandle, s32 scope)
                                prop_data += vd;
                        }
                }
-       } while (rc == 1);
+       } while (rtas_rc == 1);
 
        of_node_put(dn);
        kfree(rtas_buf);
-- 
1.7.12.4

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to