On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 22:27 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> The fallback to 32-bit DMA mask is rather odd:
> err = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> if (!err) {
> err = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev,
> DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> if (!err)
> pci_using_dac = 1;
> } else {
> err = dma_set_mask(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> if (err) {
> err = dma_set_coherent_mask(&pdev->dev,
> DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> "No usable DMA configuration,
> aborting\n");
> goto err_dma;
> }
> }
> }
> This means we only set the coherent DMA mask in the fallback path if
> the DMA mask set failed, which is silly. This fixes it to set the
> coherent DMA mask only if dma_set_mask() succeeded, and to error out
> if either fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+ker...@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 18 ++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
