Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> writes: > On 27.09.2013, at 15:08, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > >> Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> writes: >> >>> On 27.09.2013, at 12:03, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c >>>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c >>>> index fd5b393..775d368 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c >>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_host.c >>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ >>>> #include <asm/machdep.h> >>>> #include <asm/mmu_context.h> >>>> #include <asm/hw_irq.h> >>>> + >>> >>> Stray whitespace change >>> >> >> will fix >> >>>> #include "trace_pr.h" >>>> >>>> #define PTE_SIZE 12 >>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c >>>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c >>>> index b9841ad..20d03c2 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c >>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_emulate.c >>>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ int kvmppc_core_emulate_op_pr(struct kvm_run *run, >>>> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, >>>> vcpu->arch.mmu.tlbie(vcpu, addr, large); >>>> break; >>>> } >>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR >>> >>> Why? >> >> If i have CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR=m #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_64_PR will >> not work. There is a runtime check I can use IS_ENABLED(). But didn't >> want to do those. Hence moved to the symbol which will be set as >> CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR = y > > Ah, I see. The naming starts to get really confusing. Could you please > give this a slightly better name, such as > CONFIG_KVM_BOOK3S_PR_POSSIBLE or such, so that it's obvious that this > #ifdef doesn't mean "option is enabled", but instead means "option can > potentially be enabled through a module".
Will do -aneesh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
