On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 12:49 -0500, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 8:07 AM
> > To: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Cc: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20 state and
> > altivec
> > idle
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 12:52 AM
> > > To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> > > Cc: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-
> > > d...@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20 state and
> > > altivec idle
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2013-10-17 at 00:51 -0500, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 11:20 AM
> > > > > To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534; Wood Scott-B07421
> > > > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20 state
> > > > > and altivec idle
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 8:16 AM
> > > > > > To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; Wood Scott-B07421
> > > > > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20
> > > > > > state and altivec idle
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2013 1:01 AM
> > > > > > > To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534; Wood Scott-B07421
> > > > > > > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20
> > > > > > > state and altivec idle
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> > > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 2:51 PM
> > > > > > > > To: Wood Scott-B07421
> > > > > > > > Cc: Bhushan Bharat-R65777; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
> > > > > > > > Wang
> > > > > > > Dongsheng-B40534
> > > > > > > > Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] powerpc/85xx: add sysfs for pw20
> > > > > > > > state and
> > > > > > > altivec idle
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +static ssize_t show_pw20_wait_time(struct device *dev,
> > > > > > > > + struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > > > > > > char *buf) {
> > > > > > > > + u32 value;
> > > > > > > > + u64 tb_cycle;
> > > > > > > > + s64 time;
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > + unsigned int cpu = dev->id;
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > + if (!pw20_wt) {
> > > > > > > > + smp_call_function_single(cpu,
> > > > > > > > do_show_pwrmgtcr0, &value,
> > > > > 1);
> > > > > > > > + value = (value & PWRMGTCR0_PW20_ENT) >>
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > PWRMGTCR0_PW20_ENT_SHIFT;
> > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > + tb_cycle = (1 << (MAX_BIT - value)) * 2;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is value = 0 and value = 1 legal? These will make tb_cycle =
> > > > > > > 0,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > + time = div_u64(tb_cycle * 1000,
> > > > > > > > tb_ticks_per_usec) - 1;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And time = -1;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > Please look at the end of the function, :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "return sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", time > 0 ? time : 0);"
> > > > >
> > > > > I know you return 0 if value = 0/1, my question was that, is this
> > > > > correct as per specification?
> > > > >
> > > > > Ahh, also for "value" upto 7 you will return 0, no?
> > > > >
> > > > If value = 0, MAX_BIT - value = 63
> > > > tb_cycle = 0xffffffff_ffffffff,
> > >
> > > Actually, tb_cycle will be undefined because you shifted a 32-bit
> > > value
> > > (1) by more than 31 bits. s/1/1ULL/
> > >
>
> What Scott is saying is the left shift of "1" for more than 31 will be
> undefined.
> Scott this will be sign-extended, right?
It's undefined in C. I don't know what GCC on PPC specifically will do.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
