On Wed, 2013-11-13 at 12:29 -0600, Emil Medve wrote: > Somebody gratuitously added a P1023 defconfig more then two years ago > with the notion that P1023 is special due to its datapath and we're > still one year out before we'll have the (P1023) datapath driver > upstream. As of now this defconfig is just bit-rotting in the tree > creating confusion. Let's just remove it for now and we'll deal with the > entire e500v2_dpaa business when the datapath support will be upstreamed
Sure. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
