On 30.05.14 11:44, Michael Neuling wrote:
>>>
>>> Which header are these coming from, and why aren't we including
it? And is it
>>> going to still build with CONFIG_KVM=n?
>>
>> From include/asm/hvcall.h in the h_set_mode patch set I sent before.
>>
>> And yes it compiles with CONFIG_KVM=n fine.
>
>
> Please split that patch into one that adds the definitions and one
that changes the KVM code to use those definitions. Both Ben and me
can then apply the definition patch and our respective tree patch.
>
Why don't you just take the original h_set_mode patch and I'll repost
this cleanup later to ben when yours is upstream. This cleanup patch
is not critical to anything and it avoid more churn.
That works too, but please keep in mind that my path to upstream is much
longer than what you're used to ;).
Alex
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
