On Thu, Jun 12 2014, Michal Nazarewicz <min...@mina86.com> wrote: > I used “function(arg1, arg2, …)” at the *beginning* of functions when > the arguments passed to the function were included in the message. In > all other cases I left it at just “function:” (or just no additional > prefix). IMO that's a reasonable strategy.
At closer inspection, I realised drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c is Marek's code, but the above I think is still reasonable thing to do, so I'd rather standardise on having “function(…)” only at the beginning of a function. Just my 0.02 CHF. -- Best regards, _ _ .o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o ..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o) ooo +--<m...@google.com>--<xmpp:min...@jabber.org>--ooO--(_)--Ooo-- _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
