We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.

Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <min...@mina86.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyan...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com>

diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
index 9961120..4b251b0 100644
--- a/mm/cma.c
+++ b/mm/cma.c
@@ -225,12 +225,12 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base,
        *res_cma = cma;
        cma_area_count++;
 
-       pr_info("CMA: reserved %ld MiB at %08lx\n", (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M,
+       pr_info("Reserved %ld MiB at %08lx\n", (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M,
                (unsigned long)base);
        return 0;
 
 err:
-       pr_err("CMA: failed to reserve %ld MiB\n", (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M);
+       pr_err("Failed to reserve %ld MiB\n", (unsigned long)size / SZ_1M);
        return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to