On 06/18/2014 01:43 AM, Neelesh Gupta wrote:
+}
+
+static void __init get_sensor_index_attr(const char *name, u32 *index, char
*attr)
+{
+ char *hash_pos = strchr(name, '#');
+ char *dash_pos;
+ u32 copy_len;
+ char buf[8];
+
+ memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
+ *index = 0;
+ *attr = '\0';
+
+ if (hash_pos) {
+ dash_pos = strchr(hash_pos, '-');
+ if (dash_pos) {
+ copy_len = dash_pos - hash_pos - 1;
+ if (copy_len < sizeof(buf)) {
+ strncpy(buf, hash_pos + 1, copy_len);
+ sscanf(buf, "%d", index);
What if sscanf fails ? Might be an interesting exercise to try and create
multiple sensors with index 0 (or, for that matter, with the same index value).
Do you have any protection against bad input data ? Guess not; did you test
what happens if you pass bad data to the driver (such as duplicate sensor
entries) ?
We can't have duplicate entries in the device tree under the same node ?
But yes, rest other scenarios must be validated.
Was this a serious question ? Sorry, I wonder. It seems quite unlikely for a
file
system to accept two files with the same name in the same directory.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
