Hmm,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 07:27:16PM +0530, Varun Sethi wrote:
> - old_domain_info = find_domain(dev);
> + old_domain_info = dev->archdata.iommu_domain;
> if (old_domain_info && old_domain_info->domain != dma_domain) {
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> detach_device(dev, old_domain_info->domain);
Wouldn't this set dev->archdata.iommu_domain to NULL anyway, so that ...
> @@ -399,7 +394,7 @@ static void attach_device(struct fsl_dma_domain
> *dma_domain, int liodn, struct d
> * the info for the first LIODN as all
> * LIODNs share the same domain
> */
> - if (!old_domain_info)
> + if (!dev->archdata.iommu_domain)
> dev->archdata.iommu_domain = info;
We already know that it _must_ be NULL here?
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
This would shrink down the patch to:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
index 93072ba..d21b554 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c
@@ -399,8 +399,7 @@ static void attach_device(struct fsl_dma_domain
*dma_domain, int liodn, struct d
* the info for the first LIODN as all
* LIODNs share the same domain
*/
- if (!old_domain_info)
- dev->archdata.iommu_domain = info;
+ dev->archdata.iommu_domain = info;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
}
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
