On 07/23/2014 01:36 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 01:05:49PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
>> index 516f2ee..48b7ed4 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
>> @@ -45,18 +45,48 @@ static long kvmppc_stt_npages(unsigned long window_size)
>>                   * sizeof(u64), PAGE_SIZE) / PAGE_SIZE;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Checks ulimit in order not to let the user space to pin all
>> + * available memory for TCE tables.
>> + */
>> +static long kvmppc_account_memlimit(long npages)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long ret = 0, locked, lock_limit;
>> +
>> +    if (!current->mm)
>> +            return -ESRCH; /* process exited */
>> +
>> +    down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
>> +    locked = current->mm->locked_vm + npages;
>> +    lock_limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>> +    if (locked > lock_limit && !capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)) {
> 
> I took a look on mm/mlock.c::mlock() where the mlock operation
> is allowd while we have one of following conditions (not &&) :-)
> 
>         /* check against resource limits */
>         if ((locked <= lock_limit) || capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK))
>                 error = do_mlock(start, len, 1);


So? if() that you posted does lock, the if() I posted does completely
opposite operation. It is not just || vs. &&, other conditions changed too.


drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c has the same chunk which I copied here,
for example.


> 
> Thanks,
> Gavin
> 
>> +            pr_warn("RLIMIT_MEMLOCK (%ld) exceeded\n",
>> +                            rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK));
>> +            ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +    } else {
>> +            current->mm->locked_vm += npages;
>> +    }
>> +    up_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void release_spapr_tce_table(struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *stt)
>> {
>>      struct kvm *kvm = stt->kvm;
>>      int i;
>> +    long npages = kvmppc_stt_npages(stt->window_size);
>>
>>      mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
>>      list_del(&stt->list);
>> -    for (i = 0; i < kvmppc_stt_npages(stt->window_size); i++)
>> +    for (i = 0; i < npages; i++)
>>              __free_page(stt->pages[i]);
>> +
>>      kfree(stt);
>>      mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
>>
>> +    kvmppc_account_memlimit(-(npages + 1));
>> +
>>      kvm_put_kvm(kvm);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -112,6 +142,9 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_create_spapr_tce(struct kvm *kvm,
>>      }
>>
>>      npages = kvmppc_stt_npages(args->window_size);
>> +    ret = kvmppc_account_memlimit(npages + 1);
>> +    if (ret)
>> +            goto fail;
>>
>>      stt = kzalloc(sizeof(*stt) + npages * sizeof(struct page *),
>>                    GFP_KERNEL);
>> -- 
>> 2.0.0
>>
> 


-- 
Alexey
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to