Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> writes: > The encoding of the lengths in the ibm_architecture_vec array is > "interesting" to say the least. It's non-obvious how the number of bytes > we provide relates to the length value. > > In fact we already got it wrong once, see 11e9ed43ca8a "Fix up > ibm_architecture_vec definition". > > So add some macros to make it (hopefully) clearer. These at least have > the property that the integer present in the code is equal to the number > of bytes that follows it. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Seems at least as correct as the code was before... so, Reviewed-by: Stewart Smith <[email protected]> (not actually compiled or tested or anything, but my internal C preprocesser says it looks okay :) _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
