There isn't any need to keep referring to update->cpu, as we've already checked cpu == update->cpu at this point.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <n...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c index 649666d5d1c2..86fdb004ad2f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c @@ -1491,8 +1491,8 @@ static int update_cpu_topology(void *data) if (cpu != update->cpu) continue; - unmap_cpu_from_node(update->cpu); - map_cpu_to_node(update->cpu, update->new_nid); + unmap_cpu_from_node(cpu); + map_cpu_to_node(cpu, update->new_nid); vdso_getcpu_init(); } _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev