Hello Scott,

On 11/07/2014 01:34 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-11-07 at 01:31 -0600, Emil Medve wrote:
>> Hello Scott,
>>
>>
>> On 11/06/2014 03:49 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 09:18 -0600, Emil Medve wrote:
>>>> +Devices connected to a BMan instance via Direct Connect Portals (DCP) 
>>>> must link
>>>> +to the respective BMan instance
>>>> +
>>>> +- fsl,bman
>>>> +  Usage:          Required
>>>> +  Value type:     <prop-encoded-array>
>>>> +  Description:    List of phandle and DCP index pairs, to the BMan 
>>>> instance
>>>> +                  to which this device is connected via the DCP
>>>
>>> Does software need the DCP index (though for QMan there do seem to be a
>>> few registers associated with each DCP)?  Where can I find that info in
>>> the manual?
>>
>> The DCP index helps describe the topology of the devices connected to
>> the B/QMan. One might be tempted to use some address to reference said
>> DCP, unfortunately the pertinent registers/bits for said DCP(s) are not
>> into a compact region. Look at the CCSR memory map for B/QMan
>>
>> In the QMan case things are marginally better. For each hardware portal
>> there are a handful of (vaguely named *DCx*, *DCPx* or *DCP*) registers
>> (configuration, performance monitoring and debugging). However, still
>> registers and bits spread here and there
>>
>> In the BMan case things are a bit worse as the registers names are less
>> friendly and still spread around
>>
>> Do you need specific names/offsets?
> 
> My question about the manual wasn't rhetorical -- I tried to find this
> information and couldn't.

I get that. As I said, the registers/bits are spread around in the CCSR
space of each block and not named excessively friendly. As such I hinted
for some search patterns to make it easier to find them. In order to
progress the review I'm willing to prepare a list. Just let me know


Cheers,
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to