On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 03:07:51PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: >On Mon, 2014-24-11 at 22:26:59 UTC, Gavin Shan wrote: >> The flag passed to ioda_eeh_phb_reset() should be EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE, >> which is translated to OPAL_DEASSERT_RESET or something else by the >> EEH backend accordingly. >> >> The patch replaces OPAL_DEASSERT_RESET with EEH_RESET_DEACTIVATE for >> ioda_eeh_phb_reset(). > >What is the symptom? Does it not work at all or is it just a cosmetic issue? >ie. should I send this to Linus ASAP or can it wait for the next release. > >Looks like this went in as 361f2a2a1536 ("powrpc/powernv: Reset PHB in kdump >kernel") in 3.16. Should it go to stable? >
It's just a cosmetic issue and please pick it up for next release. Thanks, Gavin >cheers > _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev