Fix up various perf aspects related to ppc64's usage of dot functions:
- ignore leading '.' when generating event names and when looking for
  existing events.
- use the proper prefix when ignoring SyS symbol lookups.

Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 8 ++++++++
 tools/perf/util/symbol.c      | 6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
index c7e01ef..d465f7c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
@@ -2080,6 +2080,10 @@ static int get_new_event_name(char *buf, size_t len, 
const char *base,
 {
        int i, ret;
 
+       /* Skip the leading dot on powerpc */
+       if (*base == '.')
+               base++;
+
        /* Try no suffix */
        ret = e_snprintf(buf, len, "%s", base);
        if (ret < 0) {
@@ -2538,6 +2542,10 @@ int del_perf_probe_events(struct strlist *dellist)
                        event = str;
                }
 
+               /* Skip the leading dot on powerpc */
+               if (event && *event == '.')
+                       event++;
+
                ret = e_snprintf(buf, 128, "%s:%s", group, event);
                if (ret < 0) {
                        pr_err("Failed to copy event.");
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
index 0783311..cc04475 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol.c
@@ -137,6 +137,12 @@ static int choose_best_symbol(struct symbol *syma, struct 
symbol *symb)
        if (na >= 10 && !strncmp(syma->name, "compat_SyS", 10))
                return SYMBOL_B;
 
+       /* On powerpc, ignore the dot variants */
+       if (na >= 4 && !strncmp(syma->name, ".SyS", 4))
+               return SYMBOL_B;
+       if (na >= 11 && !strncmp(syma->name, ".compat_SyS", 11))
+               return SYMBOL_B;
+
        return SYMBOL_A;
 }
 
-- 
2.1.3

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to