On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:49:26PM -0800, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > From: Cody P Schafer <c...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Event parameters are a basic way for partial events to be specified in > sysfs with per-event names given to the fields that need to be filled in > when using a particular event. > > It is intended for supporting cases where the single 'cpu' parameter is > insufficient. For example, POWER 8 has events for physical > sockets/cores/cpus that are accessible from with virtual machines. To > keep using the single 'cpu' parameter we'd need to perform a mapping > between Linux's cpus and the physical machine's cpus (in this case > Linux is running under a hypervisor). This isn't possible because > bindings between our cpus and physical cpus may not be fixed, and we > probably won't have a "cpu" on each physical cpu. > > Changelog[v6] > Update event description to explain how required parameters > are displayed. > > CC: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > CC: Haren Myneni <hb...@us.ibm.com> > CC: Cody P Schafer <d...@codyps.com> > Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <c...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events > b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events > index 20979f8..47ad2a1 100644 > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-event_source-devices-events > @@ -52,12 +52,18 @@ Description: Per-pmu performance monitoring events > specific to the running syste > event=0x2abc > event=0x423,inv,cmask=0x3 > domain=0x1,offset=0x8,starting_index=0xffff > + domain=0x1,offset=0x8,core=? > > Each of the assignments indicates a value to be assigned to a > particular set of bits (as defined by the format file > corresponding to the <term>) in the perf_event structure passed > to the perf_open syscall. > > + In the case of the last example, a value replacing "?" would > + need to be provided by the user selecting the particular event. > + This is referred to as "event parameterization". All > + non-numerical values indicate an event parameter.
I see.. here's the glitch ;-) I thought we agreed on forcing '?' as the value for param events, not 'All non-numerical values' thanks, jirka _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev