On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 09:47 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2015-01-31 at 21:47 +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
>> >> So we can avoid the ugly #ifdef in some drivers.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haoke...@gmail.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++
>> >>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Bjorn,
>> >
>> > Do you mind putting this into your next for 3.20? Or giving us an ACK for 
>> > it if
>> > you prefer.
>>
>> I think it makes more sense to merge this along with the other 14
>> patches that remove the #ifdefs (at least, I assume that's what they
>> do; I haven't seen them).
>
> Yeah that is what they do.
>
> The problem with doing it that way is the rest of the patches are splattered
> all across the tree, so getting them merged as a series will require a lot of
> searching for acks.
>
> If you merged this one for 3.20 we could then merge the rest of the series one
> at a time as the respective maintainers get around to it during the 3.21 
> cycle.
>
> I probably should have said all that in my original mail :)
>
> Anyway it's not a big deal, but that's why it'd be nice if you could take it.

OK, sure, I didn't get the hint that it would be preferable for me to
take it.  I'll merge it for v3.20.

Bjorn
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to