On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 08:55:07AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 01:19:07PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On PHB3, PF IOV BAR will be covered by M64 window to have better PE
>> isolation.  The total_pe number is usually different from total_VFs, which
>> can lead to a conflict between MMIO space and the PE number.
>> 
>> For example, if total_VFs is 128 and total_pe is 256, the second half of
>> M64 window will be part of other PCI device, which may already belong
>> to other PEs.
>> 
>> Prevent the conflict by reserving additional space for the PF IOV BAR,
>> which is total_pe number of VF's BAR size.
>> 
>> [bhelgaas: make dev_printk() output more consistent, index resource[]
>> conventionally]
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiy...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h        |    4 ++
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h     |    3 ++
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c          |    5 +++
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c         |    4 ++
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c |   61 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  5 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h 
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h
>> index c8175a3..965547c 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/machdep.h
>> @@ -250,6 +250,10 @@ struct machdep_calls {
>>      /* Reset the secondary bus of bridge */
>>      void  (*pcibios_reset_secondary_bus)(struct pci_dev *dev);
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>> +    void (*pcibios_fixup_sriov)(struct pci_bus *bus);
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>> +
>>      /* Called to shutdown machine specific hardware not already controlled
>>       * by other drivers.
>>       */
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h 
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>> index 513f8f2..de11de7 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>> @@ -175,6 +175,9 @@ struct pci_dn {
>>  #define IODA_INVALID_PE             (-1)
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV
>>      int     pe_number;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>> +    u16     max_vfs;                /* number of VFs IOV BAR expended */
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>  #endif
>>      struct list_head child_list;
>>      struct list_head list;
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> index 8203101..022e9fe 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
>> @@ -1646,6 +1646,11 @@ void pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
>>      if (ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb)
>>              ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb(hose);
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>> +    if (ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov)
>> +            ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov(bus);
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>
>Here, and ...
>
>> +
>>      /* Configure PCI Express settings */
>>      if (bus && !pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
>>              struct pci_bus *child;
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c
>> index 5b78917..7d238ae 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-hotplug.c
>> @@ -94,6 +94,10 @@ void pcibios_add_pci_devices(struct pci_bus * bus)
>>               */
>>              slotno = PCI_SLOT(PCI_DN(dn->child)->devfn);
>>              pci_scan_slot(bus, PCI_DEVFN(slotno, 0));
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>> +            if (ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov)
>> +                    ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov(bus);
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>
>here, you have the same code.  It's good that we now do it for hot-added
>devices as well as those present at boot.  But it's bad that it happens in
>two different paths.
>
>Isn't there some way we can unify this so the same path is used for the
>initial pcibios_scan_phb() and also the hot-add case?  Maybe call
>pcibios_fixup_sriov() from pcibios_add_device()?
>


This is a very good suggestion. I have changed this and works fine.

Thanks :-)

>>              pcibios_setup_bus_devices(bus);
>>              max = bus->busn_res.start;
>>              for (pass = 0; pass < 2; pass++) {
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c 
>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>> index 1b37066..958c7a3 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>> @@ -1749,6 +1749,64 @@ static void pnv_pci_init_ioda_msis(struct pnv_phb 
>> *phb)
>>  static void pnv_pci_init_ioda_msis(struct pnv_phb *phb) { }
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>> +static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> +{
>> +    struct pci_controller *hose;
>> +    struct pnv_phb *phb;
>> +    struct resource *res;
>> +    int i;
>> +    resource_size_t size;
>> +    struct pci_dn *pdn;
>> +
>> +    if (!pdev->is_physfn || pdev->is_added)
>> +            return;
>> +
>> +    hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
>> +    phb = hose->private_data;
>> +
>> +    pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>> +    pdn->max_vfs = 0;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
>> +            res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
>> +            if (!res->flags || res->parent)
>> +                    continue;
>> +            if (!pnv_pci_is_mem_pref_64(res->flags)) {
>> +                    dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Skipping expanding VF BAR%d: 
>> %pR\n",
>> +                             i, res);
>> +                    continue;
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, " Fixing VF BAR%d: %pR to\n", i, res);
>> +            size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
>> +            res->end = res->start + size * phb->ioda.total_pe - 1;
>> +            dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "                       %pR\n", res);
>> +            dev_info(&pdev->dev, "VF BAR%d: %pR (expanded to %d VFs for PE 
>> alignment)",
>> +                            i, res, phb->ioda.total_pe);
>> +    }
>> +    pdn->max_vfs = phb->ioda.total_pe;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_sriov(struct pci_bus *bus)
>> +{
>> +    struct pci_dev *pdev;
>> +    struct pci_bus *b;
>> +
>> +    list_for_each_entry(pdev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
>> +            b = pdev->subordinate;
>> +
>> +            if (b)
>> +                    pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_sriov(b);
>> +
>> +            if (pdev->is_added)
>> +                    continue;
>> +
>> +            pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(pdev);
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * This function is supposed to be called on basis of PE from top
>>   * to bottom style. So the the I/O or MMIO segment assigned to
>> @@ -2125,6 +2183,9 @@ static void __init pnv_pci_init_ioda_phb(struct 
>> device_node *np,
>>      ppc_md.pcibios_enable_device_hook = pnv_pci_enable_device_hook;
>>      ppc_md.pcibios_window_alignment = pnv_pci_window_alignment;
>>      ppc_md.pcibios_reset_secondary_bus = pnv_pci_reset_secondary_bus;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>> +    ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_sriov = pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_sriov;
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>      pci_add_flags(PCI_REASSIGN_ALL_RSRC);
>>  
>>      /* Reset IODA tables to a clean state */
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>> 

-- 
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to